This post was originally published on this site.
Adding crypto into the finance stack has traditionally had the flair of a younger business.
On Tuesday (Feb. 3), the startup incubator Y Combinator (YC) codified that impression, announcing that its latest class of startups can now choose to receive their seed funding of $500,000 from YC in stablecoins.
“Whether crypto-focused or not, we expect many YC startups to use crypto in some way, from payments to banking to capital raising,” the incubator said.
Rather than via a traditional bank wire, YC told its seasonal cohort of budding entrepreneurs that it is now possible to have the equivalent value of dollar-pegged stablecoins transferred to a wallet controlled by the company.
The implications, however, extend well beyond just startups. YC is not merely tolerating crypto-native funding; it is formalizing it, with all the attendant requirements for governance, accounting and control. In doing so, it may offer a rare, concrete example of how digital assets can be integrated into corporate financial operations without collapsing into ideology or speculation.
For mature enterprises, many of which have spent years debating whether crypto belongs anywhere near their balance sheets, the significance may lie less in the asset itself than in the operational discipline the model requires.
Advertisement: Scroll to Continue
Read more: How Banking-Grade Crypto Is Replacing Bitcoin’s Cowboy Finance
Stablecoins Come for Corporate Plumbing
A company that receives its seed funding in stablecoins must immediately determine how those assets will be safeguarded, how spending authority is defined, and how balances are reported internally and externally. There is no conceptual buffer between receipt and use.
In traditional corporate finance, much of this work is outsourced, implicitly or explicitly, to banks. Funds arrive in accounts governed by well-established legal and regulatory frameworks. Controls are embedded in the institution. Stablecoin-based funding removes that layer and forces the organization to supply its own.
The most immediate consequence of receiving capital in a corporate wallet is the absence of a bank as gatekeeper. Transactions are not reviewed by compliance departments or delayed by correspondent networks. Finality is near-instant. That efficiency, often cited as a benefit of blockchain-based payments, carries an obvious corollary: the burden of governance shifts decisively inward.
YC-funded startups that opt for stablecoins must establish wallet architectures that reflect corporate realities rather than individual convenience. Multi-signature arrangements, role-based permissions and clear separation between custody and authorization are increasingly becoming prerequisites for credible financial management across blockchain infrastructure.
And if governance is among the most visible challenges, accounting may be the most persistent one. Stablecoins, despite their peg, do not enjoy uniform treatment as cash or cash equivalents under prevailing accounting standards. They are typically classified as intangible assets or, in some jurisdictions, as financial instruments, with implications for valuation and reporting.
For firms receiving funding in stablecoins, this is not an abstract concern. It affects how capital is recorded on day one and how subsequent expenditures are recognized.
See also: While US Debates Stablecoin Yield, Europe and Asia Set Clearer Rules
Custody as a Strategic Decision
The most tangible advantage of stablecoin-based funding emerges in payments, particularly across borders. Startups with distributed teams can compensate contractors or vendors directly, without navigating foreign exchange conversions, correspondent banking delays, or opaque fee structures. Settlement occurs on a shared ledger, typically within minutes.
For established multinationals, the relevance is difficult to ignore. Cross-border payments remain one of the least efficient aspects of global finance. Stablecoins do not eliminate regulatory or tax considerations, but they do compress the mechanics of movement. Observing how small organizations operationalize this capability offers insight into how it might scale, and where the true bottlenecks lie.
Visa, for example, earlier announced the launch of its Stablecoins Advisory Practice that serves banks, FinTechs, merchants and businesses of all sizes to help with finding answers to these questions.
And while mature enterprises are not expected to replicate the startup stablecoin model wholesale, given that few will likely accept capital, pay suppliers or manage treasury entirely in stablecoins in the near term; the YC’s cohort can still function as a distributed laboratory with experiments that are more operational than speculative.
The PYMNTS Intelligence and Citi report “Chain Reaction: Regulatory Clarity as the Catalyst for Blockchain Adoption” found that blockchain’s next leap will be shaped by regulation; that evolving guidance is beginning to create the foundations for safe, scalable blockchain adoption; and that implementation challenges continue to complicate progress.
For all PYMNTS B2B coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B Newsletter.