A New Global Trade Order

How Trump’s tariffs shaped geopolitics this year.

By , a deputy editor at Foreign Policy.


An illustration shows a line of large shopping carts facing down a small Donald Trump figure holding two shopping bags. The stars of China's flag are in the upper left corner.
An illustration shows a line of large shopping carts facing down a small Donald Trump figure holding two shopping bags. The stars of China’s flag are in the upper left corner.

Brian Stauffer illustration for Foreign Policy



Although tariffs haven’t been in vogue since the 19th century, Donald Trump has seen them as a solution for what he perceives to be an unfair global trading system since at least the 1980s.

In 2025, Trump, now U.S. president, turned to import duties as a cure-all. But in many ways, the cure turned out to be worse than the disease. As a result of the uncertainty and chaos Trump’s tariffs engendered, the U.S. economy shrank in the first quarter of this year. And while companies have so far mostly absorbed the levies’ costs, consumers are beginning to pick up the tab.

Although tariffs haven’t been in vogue since the 19th century, Donald Trump has seen them as a solution for what he perceives to be an unfair global trading system since at least the 1980s.

In 2025, Trump, now U.S. president, turned to import duties as a cure-all. But in many ways, the cure turned out to be worse than the disease. As a result of the uncertainty and chaos Trump’s tariffs engendered, the U.S. economy shrank in the first quarter of this year. And while companies have so far mostly absorbed the levies’ costs, consumers are beginning to pick up the tab.

If Americans are confused about why their hamburgers are more expensive (ground beef prices are up 14.2 percent from a year ago), the rest of the world is even more bewildered by how Trump has upended the trade order. In April, when Trump announced steep tariffs on nearly all U.S. trading partners, administration officials promised “90 deals in 90 days.” That deadline has been extended, but deals are still few and far between. The agreements that have been struck vary in permanence and formality.

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule soon in Learning Resources v. Trump, the case that will determine whether the tariffs Trump imposed pass statutory and constitutional muster. In the meantime, FP’s Keith Johnson writes that the so-called Liberation Day tariffs have created “a new reality for a country, and a planet, whose post-World War II prosperity was ushered in by a decades-long effort to dismantle barriers to trade.”

Here are five of our best reads on how Trump’s tariffs have shaped geopolitics this year.


1. Trump’s Shifting Tariffs Are Disrupting Global Shipping

By Elisabeth Braw, May 15

Shipping is, by definition, at the forefront of global trade. So, FP’s Elisabeth Braw wrote in May, it was also the first industry to feel the pain of Trump’s tariffs.

But “as is their wont, shipping lines have adapted their journeys and procedures,” Braw writes—and the long-term harm caused by shipping turbulence may instead hit land. She predicts looming job losses, starting with dockworkers.


2. Why Beijing Thinks It Can Beat Trump

By Scott Kennedy, April 10

Although he wrote this piece just a week after Trump’s April tariff announcement, the Center of Strategic and International Studies’ Scott Kennedy proved prescient in his analysis of how China would respond to U.S. duties.

“[Trump’s] escalation, brinksmanship, and volatility will likely be a monumental waste of time,” Kennedy writes, given China’s relative advantages in a trade war. “The real contest for systemic competition, at least for now, is over,” he adds—pointing to a more positive recent reappraisal by Chinese and international audiences about the resilience and strengths of the Chinese economic system compared to its U.S. counterpart.


3. Trump’s Long-Promised Tariffs Upend Global Trade

By Keith Johnson, Aug. 1

As promised, Trump delivered his deferred tariffs on Aug. 1, with punitive import taxes on nearly every good from countries around the world. “The issue,” FP’s Johnson writes, “is Trump’s continued misdiagnosis of both the problem and the solution.”

In this report, Johnson explains how the tariffs spell bad news for U.S. growth, inflation, and unemployment—and why experts think import duties will stick around even after Trump leaves office.


4. Who Holds the High Cards in Sino-American Supply Chain Poker?

By Graham Allison, Oct. 6


Gold Trump-branded playing cards for sale.
Gold Trump-branded playing cards for sale.

Trump-branded playing cards for sale at the Trump golf course in Turnberry, Scotland, on July 28.Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

Riffing on Trump’s apparent love of poker, Harvard University professor Graham Allison details the “last five hands” in the “Sino-American poker match” that was this year’s trade war. He begins with Trump’s initial April announcement and concludes with why Washington may yet have some high cards of its own to play.

While there is no easy way to eliminate vulnerabilities created by U.S. reliance on China for vital items, Allison writes, China also remains dependent on the United States for several things, and the U.S. dollar is still the world’s reserve currency.

Allison asks, “Could this mutual recognition of inescapable interdependence become the foundation for a new chapter in the rivalry between the United States and China?” Here’s to hoping 2026 brings a version of “mutual deterrence and coexistence” like that once enjoyed by the United States and the Soviet Union, Allison suggests.


5. Trump’s Tariffs Threaten the End of Neutrality

By Ali Ahmadi, Nov. 11

For a nation such as Switzerland—built on the pillars of neutrality, direct democracy, and financial prudence—Trump’s tariffs represent not just an economic shock but an existential one.

“In an era of economic coercion,” argues the Geneva Centre for Security Policy’s Ali Ahmadi, “Switzerland’s carefully cultivated exceptionalism no longer offered protection.”

Switzerland’s struggle signals a broader collapse of the postwar bargain that allowed small, wealthy nations to remain politically unaligned while economically prosperous. Middle powers everywhere, Ahmadi writes, will now be forced to choose sides in an increasingly bipolar world order.



Amelia Lester is a deputy editor at Foreign Policy.

Join the Conversation

Commenting is a benefit of a Foreign Policy subscription.

Join the Conversation

Join the conversation on this and other recent Foreign Policy articles when you subscribe now.

Join the Conversation

Please follow our comment guidelines, stay on topic, and be civil, courteous, and respectful of others’ beliefs.

You are commenting as .

Change your username:



CANCEL



Confirm your username to get started.

The default username below has been generated using the first name and last initial on your FP subscriber account. Usernames may be updated at any time and must not contain inappropriate or offensive language.