This post was originally published on this site.
Global trade still moves on paper. Couriers shuttle bills of lading, email chains stall letters of credit, and suppliers wait weeks for cash. In 2024, the Asian Development Bank pegged the trade-finance gap at about US$2.5 trillion—capital locked away instead of powering growth. Blockchain was sold as the fix, yet most pilots sputtered while a few quietly delivered. So which production-ready platform can unlock liquidity, slash fraud, and keep regulators happy in 2025? We compare three live contenders and give you the evidence to choose the right one. (GTR Review)
Read also: Trade Finance Innovation: How Blockchain and Fintech Are Reshaping Cross-Border Payments
How we evaluated the contenders
A blockchain-enabled view of global trade finance helps CFOs see liquidity and risk in real time.
Shared yardsticks keep this comparison honest. We scored each platform on seven supply-chain-finance factors that move cash and calm risk:
- Liquidity enablement
- Risk control
- Compliance automation
- Integration
- Scalability
- Cost efficiency
- Market traction
To reflect CFO priorities, liquidity and risk each carry 20 percent of the total score. Compliance and integration follow at 15 percent apiece, while scalability, cost, and traction contribute 10 percent each.
For every criterion, we pulled hard numbers (cycle-time cuts, financed volume, active members) and checked them against independent sources such as Ledger Insights, ICC reports, and bank case studies. Metrics without third-party proof were discounted. The result is a weighted, evidence-based view of where each platform excels and where it lags—setting up the snapshot that follows.
Quick scorecard: how the platforms stack up
Think of this table as a dashboard: one glance shows strengths, gaps, and potential deal-breakers.
A scorecard-style dashboard makes it easier to compare blockchain supply-chain finance platforms at a glance.
| Criterion | Polymesh | komgo | dltledgers |
| Liquidity enablement | Early stage, but designed for regulated secondary markets; recent Republic integration widens investor reach | Letter-of-credit cycle time cut by 99.58 percent from ten days to about one hour, according to ConsenSys | US$3.3 billion financed in the first 18 months, according to Ledger Insights |
| Risk control | Mandatory on-chain identity for every asset interaction | Single source of truth plus a built-in KYC module (“Optimus”) prevents duplicate financing, reported by Global Trade Review | End-to-end trade visibility and hashed documents reduce fraud risk for banks, according to Ledger Insights |
| Compliance automation | Protocol-level KYC/AML rules enforced on chain | Shared KYC repository streamlines counterparty checks | Digital documents align with MLETR in key hubs |
| Integration | APIs with growing fintech connectors; Republic wallet bridge pending | Hooks into bank trade-finance cores and treasury systems | Cloud APIs, ERP adapters, and IoT feeds; used by Singapore’s Trade Finance Registry |
| Scalability | Permissioned Substrate chain, low latency | Enterprise Ethereum network scales regionally | Hyperledger Fabric channels support private, high-throughput trades |
| Cost efficiency | Low network fees; initial tokenization setup cost | Consortium subscription offset by document savings | Pay-as-you-go SaaS, attractive to SMEs |
| Market traction | Newest entrant; node and custody partners growing (e.g., Balance in 2025) | Backed by 15 global banks and commodity majors; user base expanding, according to Global Trade Review | Roughly 45 banks and more than 400 commodity traders onboarded across Asia and the Middle East, according to Global Trade Review |
These qualitative scores (High, Moderate, Developing) sit beneath the numbers you see here. Liquidity and risk remain the heaviest-weighted factors because faster cash and lower fraud sit at the heart of any supply-chain-finance mandate.
Now that you’ve seen the bird’s-eye view, the next sections reveal where each platform truly shines.
If your priority is regulated asset tokenization, start with Polymesh
Imagine a supplier holding a US$1 million invoice but needing cash this week. On Polymesh, that receivable can be fractionalized into digital tokens governed by on-chain compliance rules, and because tokens are created directly at the protocol layer instead of through custom smart contracts, issuance takes minutes and costs far less than legacy securitization (see Polymesh’s guide on how to execute asset tokenization). Once the issuer’s wallet passes customer due diligence, tokens list to pre-verified investors the same morning; settlement lands in the supplier’s account hours later, with no couriers and no manual reconciliation.
Polymesh positions itself as a public permissioned blockchain purpose-built for tokenizing regulated real-world assets.
Identity is the backbone. Every key that touches a regulated asset on Polymesh must belong to a verified legal entity, and each transfer is pre-checked against KYC/AML rules at the protocol layer, according to Polymesh documentation. According to Polymesh identity documentation, each participant completes customer due diligence through a permissioned KYC provider that creates a single on-chain identity and CDD claim for that legal entity.
Issuers and funding banks can reuse that verified identity across multiple receivables or programs instead of re-running KYC from scratch on every trade, which shortens onboarding and trims external KYC fees.
Regulators get an instant answer to “Who owns this security right now?” while investors know the asset can’t hop between anonymous wallets.
Liquidity follows transparency. By lowering the minimum ticket, a mid-market fund, a regional bank, and a family office can all buy slices of the same invoice, sharpening discount rates. Take a ninety-day, US$10 million receivable: cutting the annualized discount from 5 percent to 4 percent saves the exporter about US$25,000, cash that can fund the next production run.
Polymesh is still early in supply-chain finance; live tokenized-invoice pilots are limited and ERP connectors are maturing. Yet its compliance-first design maps neatly to Europe’s DLT Pilot Regime, which since March 23 2023 has let authorized venues trade tokenized securities under a regulatory sandbox. For issuers planning to securitize receivables or bundle inventory notes into regulated funds, getting comfortable with Polymesh now is a smart, forward-looking move.
If you live and breathe commodity letters of credit, look hard at komgo
Commodity finance still relies on couriers. A single crude-oil shipment can require more than 30 original documents and involve two dozen parties, locking up working capital for over a week. komgo removes that delay by moving every file—LC application, inspection report, KYC pack—into one shared, permissioned ledger that banks, inspectors, and traders update in real time.
Komgo brands itself as the largest multi-bank trade finance platform, serving banks and corporates in digital trade services.
The payoff is measurable. In early production runs, the platform cut letter-of-credit turnaround by 99.58 percent, from ten days to about one hour, according to ConsenSys. For a US$200 million copper trade, nine saved days frees roughly US$493,000 in cash.
Risk drops along with the cycle time. Structured data means a cargo can’t be pledged to two banks; any duplicate attempt flags instantly. komgo’s Optimus module lets members reuse a counterparty’s KYC pack instead of chasing fresh documents each quarter, a feature praised by BNP Paribas and Société Générale in Global Trade Review coverage.
Integration is pragmatic. Most shareholder banks feed komgo data straight into their trade-finance cores, while corporates connect from existing treasury workstations with no rip-and-replace required.
Scale matters, and komgo has it. Citi, ING, Shell, and 15 other founding shareholders seeded the network; newer entrants such as Lloyds, SMBC, and Rabobank joined as early as 2019, helping the platform surpass US$1 billion in financed volume by 2020, according to ConsenSys. If your business relies on letters of credit for crude, metals, or agri-commodities, komgo offers the quickest, lowest-risk path to cash today.
If you need a fast, flexible network for SME supply chains, dltledgers delivers
Mid-tier manufacturers and agri-exporters often wait weeks for financing while paper crawls from factory to head office. dltledgers turns that paper trail into a single digital thread. From purchase order to customs release, every milestone is notarized on a Hyperledger Fabric ledger; when a step is confirmed, a smart contract alerts the funding bank and cash arrives within hours.
dltledgers presents itself as a fast, flexible blockchain platform for SME supply chains and cross-border trade finance.
Scale is proven. In the platform’s first 18 months (to April 2020) it processed US$3.3 billion across roughly 400 cross-border trades, according to Ledger Insights. Users such as agribusiness Agrocorp report 15–20 percent lower financing costs because banks can see tamper-proof shipment data in real time.
Transparency also cuts risk. Each bill of lading, inspection certificate, or IoT ping is hashed to the ledger, so forged documents flag instantly. Rabobank called the real-time view “a game-changer that halved our document-handling time” after financing a US$12 million wheat shipment from North America to Indonesia, according to Global Trade Review.
Onboarding is light. Suppliers join through a cloud portal, connect their ERP via APIs, and start transacting without dedicated nodes or heavy up-front fees, ideal for multi-country supply chains with varied tech readiness.
If your network spans emerging markets, involves multiple banks, or values agility over consortium politics, dltledgers offers the quickest route to cheaper cash and lower fraud today, not someday.
Digital-trade laws are catching up: here’s what matters next
- United Kingdom – The Electronic Trade Documents Act took effect on September 20 2023, giving an electronic bill of lading the same legal status as paper.
- European Union – The DLT Pilot Regime has applied since March 23 2023, creating a sandbox for trading and settling tokenized securities such as invoice-backed notes.
- Early adopters – Singapore, Bahrain, and Abu Dhabi recognize electronic transferable records under UNCITRAL’s Model Law, and more jurisdictions joined a 2024 UNECE–ICC call to action for paperless trade.
Why does this matter? Legal clarity turns on-chain proofs into enforceable rights. Once a court treats a digital bill of lading as title, banks can raise advance rates and insurers can underwrite larger policies, accelerating liquidity and trimming risk premiums.
Interoperability is the next hurdle. The ICC’s Digital Standards Initiative is drafting common data models so a letter of credit executed on komgo can trigger payment on dltledgers. Pilots launched in 2024 under the ICC–UNECE program, but full network-to-network handshakes remain work in progress.
Bottom line: the legal and standards tailwinds of 2024-2025 remove the last excuses for paper. Start a blockchain-finance pilot now and you enter a regulatory climate ready for end-to-end digital trade.
Five questions to ask before you pull the trigger
- Which single bottleneck comes first?
Tackle one pain point (slow LCs, duplicate-invoice fraud, or thin lender coverage) and prove value before phase two.
- Who must be live on day one?
A network is only as strong as its counterparties. Secure at least one anchor buyer or funding bank before you sign.
- How will data flow from ERP to chain?
Map the two or three fields you’ll automate in the pilot. Manual uploads work for a proof of concept, but they erase ROI at scale.
- Is compliance comfortable?
Show your KYC, sanctions, and audit trails on-chain. Early sign-off from the risk team prevents last-minute blockers.
- What metric will unlock expansion?
Pick a number (days of cash-conversion saved, basis-point spread cut, or share of documents digitized), track it relentlessly, and publicize the win.